Student comments from EPID600 Spring 2010

(in order by date submitted - click here for random order)

(About student comments)

______________________________

1: “Group activities have been excellent learning sessions.”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/18)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

2: “I really enjoy working with my group. Everyone has something positive to add!”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/19)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

4: “I am continually surprised by how well our group works together. It is definitely helping me get the most out of this class.”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/18)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

5: “Lauren is a great TA and Vic is a remarkable instructor. Thank you both for all the effort you put into this class. It is paying off and EPI 600 is an enjoyable and engaging experience. I love the group work structure that allows us to learn by teaching others.”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/17)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

6: “I really love my group. Everyone has been doing great work and things have been going smoothly.”
Mitchell, BSPH student, HPM, TA: Lauren (1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/18)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

7: “I do like the course, but I feel that some of the case study questions get muddled. And then I get very frustrated just trying to figure out what is being asked. If the questions could be looked over for clarity I would really appreciate it thanks!”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/18)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

8: “I have enjoyed working with all of my group members. Everyone does an excellent job of being prepared and participating in group discussion!”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/16)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

10: “This course is challenging, but I really like it!”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/19)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

11: “The lab is where I learn most of the basic principles for EPID600. My classmates always provide more clarity in working through the case studies than I could get from the lecture alone.”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/19)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

12: “Group 13's members has been great to work with.”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/16)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

14: “Team-based Learning works very well for this class. Thank you for exceptionally exemplifying what every other course is implementing. Please share your team-based learning tips with other departments at the school.”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/20)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

15: “I think our group strategy is great because everyone comes prepared to discuss answers. We answer all of the questions on our own, and then go around in a circle with each person answering one question. If there's any concern, then we discuss the answer and modify it if necessary. This way, everyone is ready and participates in our group.”
(1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/21)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

16: “All of the evaluations I have for my group members are really high, but our group is really exceptional. I have been so pleased to work with everyone. Our group members are incredibly smart and grasp a lot of the material really well. Everyone is almost always thoroughly prepared (and we all work through all of the questions individually to help our own understanding of the material, so that's a lot of work.) We almost always reach consensus pretty easily, and people aren't afraid to ask questions if they don't understand each other's answers. I feel really fortunate to have been put into this group, and they really have enhanced my experience of this class.”
Megan, MPH student, HBHE, TA: Quynh (1st peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/02/18)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

20: “Up until our homework on the water filtration case, it seemed like we were doing the same problems each week; calculating rates and ratios.

I would prefer a little more 'big picture' analysis and discussion.”

(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

22: “It's hard, but stimulating”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

23: “I have yet to form an appropriate opinion for a class in which I've only participated for a little over a month. To date I do not enjoy this class given its excessive constraints on my time due to the severely verbose assignments (in which many times I come out more confused than before I started the assignment). With the first test being administered today, and several more lectures until the end of the course, I'm hoping time allows for the course to become more inspiring and less tedious.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

25: “The case study questions building on themselves so heavily and being so involved i don't think helps me learn the material very well. For someone just learning this material it is too much to try to jump from just reading and listening to doing. I think a workbook would be very helpful as supplemental material, with examples of how to look at graphs in research articles and interpret them in an epidemiologic framework.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

27: “nope, overall very enjoyable.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

29: “I've been really enjoying the course. I think the pace is perfect find the material fascinating.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

30: “The TA lectures are far more helpful than the in-class lectures. I would be lost without them!”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

32: “no thanks, in general I like the course and it is challenging.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

34: “Nope. Fun course, well done.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

35: “It would be very helpful to have 1 concise document that gives us all relevant dates, not just an assignment schedule that requires us to look elsewhere for other details.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

36: “This is confusing stuff! maybe we could make a formula sheet together as we go along?”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

37: “Nope”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

38: “I do not like that the class is so large that we have to be broken up into different TA groups. 300 plus people is way to large for a required masters course.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

39: “The course structure is terribly confusing, but Vic is great. Thanks!”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

41: “I just want to say that I am also really thankful to have access to the lecture slides via powerpoint (and with speaker notes). I am trying to beef up on quantitative skills via short courses at Odum this semester, in preparation for my practicum this summer, and many of the short course times conflict with the lecture time for this course. Thanks!”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

43: “The course is somewhat frustrating in sense that the context in which we read certain words that should have a standard definition in fact, do not. For instance, the use of the word "rate"and the use of the term "mortality rate" given that the mortality rate is not actually a rate.

Could be a personal thing, but this sort of issue drives me nuts!”

(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

45: “interesting!”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

50: “Some of the questions that have been included in the case studies have been very frustrating. The wording isn't always entirely clear, so we spend a lot of time as a group even trying to figure out what is being asked, as opposed to working through the concepts. Although sometimes I feel that case study questions help me to work through concepts from the class, other times I feel that the time spent on them is not helpful in developing my understanding of epidemiological concepts(eg. looking through an article for mathematical errors). A clearer correlation between the most important concepts we are learning and then applying them in specific ways in the case study would help my learning.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

53: “It's frustrating that the case studies focus on things that are not covered in lectures. It also seems that the questions are asked in unnecessarily convoluted ways sometimes. I understand the importance of being familiar with, for example, the different terms used to refer to the same concept, but more consistency within the course would be nice. Also, it's certainly important for us to grapple and engage with the course material in novel ways, but there are some instances where our group ends up just going back and forth about what the question is actually asking, not how to get the answer. Finally, I really love our group and think that we do a good job of reaching the correct answers, but I hear reports from other groups that they just don't work well, and that seems somewhat unfair that someone's learning and grade can be so affected by randomly getting stuck with bad group-mates.”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

55: “No comment”
(TAeval1, Classroom course, 2010/02/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

57: “I don't understand why comments are requested. Clearly Vic has been teaching this class for 30 years, and I would be more than surprised to find out that my comments made a difference in how this course is taught. Regardless, I will say that I was severely disappointed in the course material, course structure, and overall experience. Vic appears to be a very genuine, caring, kind person who knows the field well. However, given that this course was a survey class, I would expect a better, more comprehensive, applicable approach to the material and coursework. As a future hospital administrator/manager, nearly nothing I learned in this course will be applicable to my job. I left the workforce to pursue a degree in healthcare administration which is a large reason for my dissatisfaction with this course; I could have been spending my time learning health law, mergers and acquisitions, marketing, healthcare entrepreneurship, etc, etc. Instead I was spending my time learning how to calculate prevalence... a skill I will undoubtedly never use again. My comments are unfortunately not positive, however, my negative sentiment is only partially an indictment on the structure of the course (test instructions 2000 words long, weekly assignments that consume 5-6 hours of my out-of-class time, and lectures that only loosely tied in with recitation). The other side of the issue is the School of Public health's poor course structure; this is an issue for which Vic has no control. In summation, Vic as a presenter was enjoyable. The course itself was quite nearly the worst class I have ever taken. If I could make a suggestion, it would be to implement some simplicity in tasks/homework/tests (shorter instructions, fewer questions, less verbiage) and then show me how I, as a future hospital administrator will use this information. One last, separate, note. Jen was a great TA. She was positive, funny, and all around enjoyable to have in class. Thanks”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/05/02)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

59: “Jen's powerpoints were really clear and helpful and I appreciated her lectures.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/20)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

60: “Jen you are a great ta!”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/20)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

61: “Tough but worth it. One of the few classes that forced me to talk and become friends with students in other programs.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/20)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

64: “I loved working and getting to know this group of people.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/27)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

65: “Lauren is great. I know that is not descriptive, but it is true. She clarified things and consulted other TAs when she wasn't sure. She was always available and always worked through things before we did them in lab.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/20)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

67: “Thanks for your help Lauren. You have a talent for teaching and I'm very happy I had the chance to be in your group. I appreciate your effort in making epi fun for us. Although this course was (sometimes very!) challenging for me, you always simplified concepts and presented them in a way that really made sense. Good luck with your upcoming wedding!!”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/22)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

69: “Lauren was an amazing instructor. Our group was one of the best in the course and a lot of that was due to Lauren. Lauren has an amazing ability of communicating complex concepts clearly to people who don't have a clear understanding of the underlying principals. She always has a relevant example that perfectly fits the conceptual model. Additionally, her review materials were vital in succeeding on exams.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/30)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

70: “great group of people who were enthusiastic about learning the material...and the a great mix as far as establishing a good rapport with the TA.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/05/01)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

71: “The class is just too big.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/23)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

72: “I enjoyed the course material, however sometimes the nuts and bolts of it seemed tedious (such is life!). I really enjoyed the case study topics. I would've preferred Vic's lecture and Lydia's lab presentation to be on the same topic each week rather than one week out of sync.”
Anne, UNK student, UNDC, TA: Lydia (2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

73: “We had a phenomenal group that came ready to discuss our answers every time. Wonderful people and wonderful group members, all of them.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/25)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

75: “Lydia was great!!!!!!!”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/22)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

76: “Epidemiology was a great class and I really enjoyed reading the case studies!”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/20)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

79: “Lydia was a great TA! Thanks for your help throughout the semester!”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/22)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

80: “This was one of the few group activities in the entire school that I enjoyed, learned from and actually eagerly anticipated. I did not have the feeling that we were simply providing a deliverable but were involved in teaching and learning. Don't change this; in a class this large there needs to be a functional small group.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/28)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

81: “We discussed this as a group, but I really wish the group case studies were worth more for the amount of time we spend on them. It bothers me that a person could never come to lecture or group work and still get a very good grade.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/27)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

82: “EPID600 provides all of the resources needed to gain proficiency in basic concepts of epidemiology, while letting students work at their own pace. The class puts a lot of responsibility on students, in that learning is strongly encouraged and rewarded, but not force-fed in the more traditional manner.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/25)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

84: “Thank you, Quynh! You were a great TA.”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/30)
Show comments in random order.
______________________________

85: “Thanks!”
(2nd peer evaluation, Classroom course, 2010/04/27)
Show comments in random order.

(An additional 32 comments were received but the students did not authorize their dissemination.)

Back to top Information for students EPID160 home page

2010a, compiled 02/23/2010, 05/08/2010